@PennyOaken
I don't see how that's true. They can flood you anyway without numbers too. And it would be relevant info for selecting where to migrate. I want good mod to masses ratio.
@rmbles @Gargron
Top-level
@PennyOaken 2 comments
@kaukamieli @rmbles @Gargron if you’re shopping for instances, you’re going to get more mileage out of “does this instance have a public moderation policy, and does it incorporate a way to handle ban appeals, mistakes (by users and moderators), and improvement?”. Unless an instance is run by a dedicated social media corporation, “fast” moderation is the trade off from “Fast, Good, Cheap” and “more moderators” only makes diminishing returns on “fast”, sometimes at the expense of “good” |
@kaukamieli @rmbles @Gargron the analogy I use when explaining the security implications of publicly detailing your moderation team / resources is this:
Your moderators, and the tech they use (Reddit’s AutoModerator, for instance) are directly analogous to an Intrusion Detection System, an IDS.
You don’t disclose the configuration, location, or number of your IDS appliances, or intruders circumvent them.